Legal Opinion

Town of Tonawanda v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 23, 1967No. Claim Nos. 44332, 44433, 44474PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum: We concur with the amount of the award. This affirmance, however, should not be construed as establishing the principle that the value of land subject to various kinds of restrictions may not be affected by the restrictions. The deed of conveyance from the grantor county to the claimant town recited “ that the premises herein-before described are to be used for municipal purposes only”. There is no provision that the covenant should run with the land, be binding upon the grantee’s assigns or revert to the grantor. Nor does it appear that the provision is of benefit to the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Matter of City of New York (Upper N.Y. Bay)New York Court of Appeals · 1927
  2. In re East River Gas Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
  3. Town of Tonawanda v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1966
  4. Matter of East River Gas Company of Long Island CityNew York Court of Appeals · 1907

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Town of Peru v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1969
  2. Appeal of Condemnation by the Commonwealth, Department of HighwaysSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API