Brown v. Commonwealth

OPINION by

Judge Williams, Jr.,

This is an appeal by Harry Durst and Maye Durst, as owners of Durst Buster Brown shoe store, from an order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of *137Review (Board) granting benefits to Anthony Gamza (claimant). The Board affirmed a referee’s decision that the claimant had not committed willful misconduct, as to be ineligible by force of Section 402(e) of the Unemployment Compensation Law.1

Until December 29, 1978, the claimant was employed by the Bursts as a salesman in their shoe store, having worked for them approximately one year. During the period of his…