Legal Opinion

Grooms v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided September 10, 1984No. CR 84-44PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John I. Purtle, Justice.

Appellant was tried before a jury as an habitual offender on a charge of theft by receiving and was sentenced to 20 years in the Arkansas Department of Correction and fined the sum of $10,000. After giving notice of appeal the attorney for appellant dismissed the appeal by and with the expressed consent of the appellant. Subsequently the present counsel initiated a timely Rule 37 hearing wherein it was alleged that the statute pursuant to which appellant was tried is unconstitutional; that the court erred in trial procedure; that appellant did not knowingly and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Neal v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
  3. Blackmon v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
  4. Spears v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
  5. Newton v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dunham v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  2. Conway v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1998
  3. Grooms v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  4. William Grooms v. A.L. Lockhart, Director, Arkansas Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API