Legal Opinion
Cuevas v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided October 1, 1999No. 98-2818PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
741 So.2d 1234 (1999)
Monte Kitana CUEVAS, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 98-2818.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
October 1, 1999.
J. Peyton Quarles, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Carmen F. Corrente, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
ANTOON, C.J.
Monte Cuevas appeals his judgments and sentences, arguing that he is entitled to receive a new trial because the verdict rendered by the jury in this case constituted a truly inconsistent verdict. We disagree and affirm.
In March 1996, Mr.…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. DixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. McCloudSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
- State v. EnmundSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
- Mahaun v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1979
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2007
- Moody v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
- Waits v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
- In Re Standard Jury Instruct. in Criminal Cases No. 2008-01Supreme Court of Florida · 2008