Legal Opinion

In Re Fixel

United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided November 27, 2002No. 19-10171PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER

RANDOLPH BAXTER, Bankruptcy Judge.

I

The matter before the Court is the Trustee’s Objection to Exemption claimed by Debtors, Robert and Lynne Fixel. The Court acquires core matter jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 157(a) and (b), 28 U.S.C. § 1334, and General Order Number 84 of this District. Following a duly noticed hearing, the Court makes the following findings and conclusions:

Robert and Lynne Fixel, (“Debtors”), filed their bankruptcy petition for relief under Chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code. Two of the assets claimed on Schedule C were…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Felder v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. MacKey v. Lanier Collection Agency & Service, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. De Canas v. BicaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Free v. BlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Pennsylvania v. NelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1956

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re DiguilioDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2003
  2. In Re TomlinUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API