United States v. Davis
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
1ConcurrenceCrawford, Judge
This Court, in numerous cases, has indicated that substance rather than form will control. As pointed out by the majority, appellant entered a plea pursuant to a pretrial agreement. Like many defendants, when faced with the moment of truth, appellant probably could not admit the elements involved; thus, the confessional stipulation in the case. See United States v. Penister, 25 MJ 148, 153 (CMA 1987) (Cox, J., concurring). The defense here has not indicated what evidence it would have introduced, and has not shown prejudice, as required by United States v. Rivera, 46 MJ 52 (1997), and United…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. CareUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
- United States v. Lorenzo Jesus Mejia-AlarconCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. KossmanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1993
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.