Legal Opinion

Preece v. Burns' Administrator

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided April 23, 1935PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Stanley, Commissioner—

Affirming.

The appellants, Philip Preece and R. C. Burton, assign three reasons why the judgment against them on a $5,000 note should not have been rendered and should now be reversed. As the last of several successive renewals they, with the three officers and only stockholders of the Hope Construction Company, as accommodation indorsers, signed its note to Mrs. Cora Burns, dated December 24, 1930, due March 15,1931, and calling for 10 per cent, interest. The court undertook to purge the debt of usury and no question is here raised as to' the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Star Mills v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
  2. Enterprise Foundry & MacHine Works v. Miners' Elkhorn Coal Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  3. Bank of Anderson County v. FosterCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  4. Crawford v. CrawfordCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  5. First National Bank v. BryanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Preece v. Burn's AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935
  2. Bratten, Admr. v. McKelveyOhio Court of Appeals · 1939
  3. Stegemiller v. CroweCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1944
  4. McGee v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API