Legal Opinion

In re Investigation Into Solarcity Corp.

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided April 26, 2019No. 18-207PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtReiber, C.J.

¶ 1. Petitioner SolarCity Corporation appeals the Public Utility Commission's decision that petitioner violated 30 V.S.A. § 248 and Commission Rule 5.101 by constructing rooftop solar-energy net-metering systems without first obtaining certificates of public good and its imposition of a civil penalty pursuant to 30 V.S.A. § 30.1 We affirm.

I. Overview of Net-Metering Process

¶ 2. We begin with a brief overview of the net-metering process. With an exception not relevant here, Vermont law prohibits any corporation from constructing a new electric-generation facility without first obtaining a…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. City of Burlington v. Fairpoint Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2009
  2. Trybulski v. Bellows Falls Hydro-Electric Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1941
  3. Sabre v. Rutland RailroadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1913
  4. In re L. R. R.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1983
  5. In re Petition of Stowe Cady Hill Solar, LLCSupreme Court of Vermont · 2018

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re Petition of Acorn Energy Solar 2, LLC (Therese Holmes and Timothy Holmes, Appellants)Supreme Court of Vermont · 2021
  2. In re Petition of Apple Hill Solar LLCSupreme Court of Vermont · 2021
  3. In re Construction & Operation of a Meteorological TowerSupreme Court of Vermont · 2019
  4. In re Investigation to Review the Avoided Costs that Serve as Prices for the Standard-Offer Program in 2020 (Allco Renewable Energy Limited & PLH LLC, Appellants)Supreme Court of Vermont · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API