Callaway v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
ALTENBERND, Judge.
Albert Callaway appeals the summary denial of his motion seeking postconviction relief. He claims that his consecutive habitual felony offender sentences are impermissible under the rule announced in Hale v. State, 630 So.2d 521 (Fla.1993). We conclude that Hale applies to both habitual violent felony and habitual felony sentences. Even though Mr. Callaway’s sentences became final more than two years ago, he is entitled to challenge his consecutive habitual felony offender sentences during the two-year period following the issuance of Hale. Accordingly, we reverse and remand…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Linkletter v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Hill v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Miller v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Heflin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Callaway v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994