Legal Opinion

Manhattan Industries, Inc. v. Paul

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 16, 1972No. 47242PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Deen, Judge.

Where the trial court overrules the defendant’s motion for summary judgment this court will not reverse unless from the entire record construed against *596the movant it appears that there is an absence of any genuine issue as to all material facts and that the defendant is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. Atlanta Gas Light Co. v. Roberson, 120 Ga. App. 361 (170 SE2d 587). The sole issue presented to us is whether the injured plaintiff was an employee or independent contractor under a one-shot oral engagement to pick up a rental truck for the appellant and drive it to a…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. ATLANTA GAS LIGHT COMPANY v. RobersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Utz v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
  2. Turner v. NoeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
  3. Coopers', Inc. v. HolmesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
  4. Black v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  5. Manhattan Industries, Inc. v. PaulCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API