Legal Opinion
Mason, Admr. v. City of Cincinnati
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided June 25, 1951No. 7444PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
A motion has been made to dismiss this appeal on questions of law. In the Common Pleas Court of Hamilton County a motion to quash service of summons was'made and sustained.
The final entry from which such appeal was taken is as follows:
“This day this cause came on to be heard upon the motion of the defendant Dr. William Garrett Rice, to. quash service of summons, and being submitted to the Court by the briefs and arguments of counsel, the Court being fully advised in the premises, finds said motion well taken and should be sustained, and
“IT IS ACCORDINGLY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED,…
3Cases cited1 opinion
- Puthoff v. Owens-Illinois Glass Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1938
4Cited by1 opinion
- MacKey v. ElliottOhio Court of Appeals · 1958