Legal Opinion

Baker v. Kennerup

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided February 5, 1928PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The defendants were husband and wife at a time when they held two lots of land by the entirety. Subsequently, they were divorced, whereby each of them became seized of an equal undivided one-half interest in the land as tenant in common. 2Bish. Mar. D. § 1649 et seq.; 13 R.C.L. p. 1121; Butlar v.Butlar, 67 N.J. Eq. 136.

During their marriage the husband undertook to erect a building upon such land, but found that he was without $372.30 of the amount necessary to complete the building. It was thereupon agreed between him and his wife that if she would advance this sum toward the completion of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kelso v. KelsoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1924
  2. Buttlar v. ButtlarNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1904
  3. Kelso v. KelsoNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1924

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lawrence v. LawrenceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963
  2. Townsend v. TownsendSuperior Court of Delaware · 1933
  3. Eberle v. SomonekNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
  4. Smith v. SmithNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963
  5. Kraus v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1951

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API