Baker v. Kennerup
New Jersey Court of Chancery
1Opinion of the Court
The defendants were husband and wife at a time when they held two lots of land by the entirety. Subsequently, they were divorced, whereby each of them became seized of an equal undivided one-half interest in the land as tenant in common. 2Bish. Mar. D. § 1649 et seq.; 13 R.C.L. p. 1121; Butlar v.Butlar, 67 N.J. Eq. 136.
During their marriage the husband undertook to erect a building upon such land, but found that he was without $372.30 of the amount necessary to complete the building. It was thereupon agreed between him and his wife that if she would advance this sum toward the completion of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Kelso v. KelsoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1924
- Buttlar v. ButtlarNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1904
- Kelso v. KelsoNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1924
3Cited by6 opinions
- Lawrence v. LawrenceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963
- Townsend v. TownsendSuperior Court of Delaware · 1933
- Eberle v. SomonekNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
- Smith v. SmithNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963
- Kraus v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1951
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.