Legal Opinion

Hodges v. Harrell

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 7, 1927PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McHaNey, J.,

(after stating the facts). Counsel on both sides of this case, in their very able briefs, have presented for our consideration some very interesting questions. Appellants contend that, where a lease is executed to several tracts of land by the terms of which the lessee is required to drill a well on said lands within a certain specified time, and thereafter the lessee assigns one' of said tracts to another person, the assignee or the original lessee is bound, either by the express or implied covenants contained in the original lease, to drill a well on such tract within such time,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Little Rock Granite Co. v. ShallSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1894
  2. Braddock v. EnglandSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908
  3. Wales-Riggs Plantations v. BanksSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
  4. Morris v. GreenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bassett v. BourlandSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
  2. Brixey v. Union Oil Company of CaliforniaDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1968
  3. Vickers v. PeakerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API