Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

United States v. Bonnie Kaye Little

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided March 22, 1994No. 92-2155Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

PAUL KELLY, Jr., Circuit Judge,

concurring in part and dissenting in part.

I concur in the court’s opinion, with the exception of overruling the statement in United States v. Dimick, 990 F.2d 1164, 1166 (10th Cir.1993), that private sleeper cars on passenger trains can be comparable to hotel rooms where an occupant enjoys a heightened expectation of privacy. Ct.Op. at 1504. Dimick is correct and faithful to circuit precedent when taken in context. Dimick involved a search of a private sleeper car without consent or probable cause and followed United States v. Bloom, 975 F.2d 1447, 1453 n. 6…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Florida v. BostickSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. United States v. Michael BloomCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
  3. United States v. Dennis P. DimickCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API