M. Gimble & Sons v. King
Court of Appeals of Texas
Appeal from the County Court of Jefferson. Tried below before Hon. D. P. Wheat.
1Opinion of the Court
FLY, Associate Justice.
Appellants instituted suit against C. S. King, and W. H. Spurlock, to recover $453, alleging that they had sold King certain goods and merchandise whose value amounted in the aggregate to the sum specified, which he had agreed to pay, and that Spurlock had executed his promissory note for the same sum. The circumstances were alleged to be that Spurlock was indebted to King, and appellants were about to have a writ of garnishment served on him when he agreed to and did give the promissory note sued on.
King answered that he had purchased the goods from appellants and had…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hall v. . StevensNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Piehl v. PiehlMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
- Gibson v. TobyNew York Supreme Court · 1869
- Western White Bronze Co. v. PortreyNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
3Cited by19 opinions
- Rushing v. Citizens' National Bank of PlainviewCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
- Cooper Grocery Co. v. StrangeTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929
- Pierce Fordyce Oil Ass'n v. WoodsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
- Truscon Steel Co. v. Thirlwell Electric Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936
- Barclay v. FalveyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.