Legal Opinion

Hull v. Pearson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 10, 1899PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from judgment on report of referee. Bill by Robert B. Hull and others, as executors of, and trustees under, the last will and testament of Joseph Wild, deceased, against ■Charles Pearson and others, defendants, impleaded with the Long Island Baptist Association. There was a decree construing the will, and defendants Pearson and others appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtGoodrich, P. J.

This appeal involves the construction of the last will of Joseph Wild, who died September 3, 1896, leaving a large estate, consisting entirely of personal property. The testator, after directing the payment of his debts, bequeathed to his wife a life estate in certain personal property, and then gave the residue of his property to his executors in trust to pay a number of annuities, with which *325we are not concerned, and also a number of specific legacies to various charitable, benevolent, and religious institutions. The clauses which have direct reference to the question involved read as…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Tilden v. . GreenNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. Patch v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Williams v. . WilliamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1853
  4. Finlay v. King's LesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
  5. Booth v. Baptist Church of Christ of PoughkeepsieNew York Court of Appeals · 1891

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ward v. StanardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API