Legal Opinion

People v. Howard

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 27, 1965No. Crim. 2197PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINLEY, J. pro tem. *

Appeal from the judgment of conviction on three counts of grand theft, based upon obtaining money by deceit and false pretenses, and from the order revoking probation.

Reversal is sought on the ground that appellant was not advised of his right to counsel and to remain silent prior to the making of admissions which were introduced into evidence at his trial.

Appellant was charged by information and pleaded not guilty to three counts of grand theft in violation of Penal Code, section 487. He was tried before a jury which, on January 12, 1959, returned a verdict of guilty on…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. DoradoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  2. People v. WilkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  3. People v. BuggCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  4. People v. RobertsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. People v. RamirezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  2. People v. GonzalesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. People v. VestCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  4. People v. MunozCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  5. People v. SilvaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API