Legal Opinion

Rapp v. Carey

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 6, 1977PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHarold J. Hughes, J.

The plaintiffs are managerial and confidential employees of the State of New York and have brought this action on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated* to have Executive Order No. 10.1 (9 NYCRR 3.10) issued by the defendant, Governor Hugh L. Carey, declared unconstitutional and to permanently enjoin its enforcement. They have moved for a preliminary injunction, and defendants have cross-moved for summary judgment dismissing the amended complaint.

The terms of the Executive Order, issued on October 22, 1976, correspond to those in Executive Order No. 10 which was limited to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Evans v. CareyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fullilove v. CareyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  2. Rapp v. CareyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  3. Rapp v. CareyNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Fullilove v. CareyNew York Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Nicholas v. KahnNew York Supreme Court · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API