Legal Opinion

In re Walz

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota

Decided March 15, 2016No. BKY 15-43077PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ALLOWING EXEMPTION

ROBERT J. KRESSEL, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE

This case came on for hearing on the trustee’s objection to the debtor’s claimed homestead exemption. Matthew D. Swanson appeared for the trustee, Randall L. Seaver, and Andrew C. Walker appeared for the debtor. The court has jurisdiction over this proceeding under 28 U.S.C. §§ 157(b)(1) and 1334. This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(B). For the reasons stated below, the trustee’s objection is overruled, and the debtor’s homestead exemption is allowed.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

The relevant facts are not in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. White v. StumpSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. In Re SmoinikarUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1996
  3. In Re CutignolaUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2011
  4. In re Beachside I Homeowners Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re CantuUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 2016
  2. Haleigh ZentUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho · 2022
  3. Kenneth Michael Bauer and Raya Sue BauerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 2022
  4. Lynn E. Feldman, Chapter 7 Trustee v. BuffenmeyerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API