Max L. Krueger v. Rogers C. B. Morton, Secretary of the Interior
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CHRISTENSEN, District Judge. *
Concluding that the pause ordered by the appellee Secretary in the issuance of coal prospecting permits, although protracted as it turned out, neither required an environmental impact statement nor constituted an abuse of the discretion afforded by relevant statutes, we affirm a summary judgment granted by the district court which dismissed the complaint of a disappointed applicant for such a permit. Whether the pause ultimately proves one “that refreshes” will have to be determined in a different context 1 and in another case to the extent that further judicial…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Sierra Club v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. CampSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Hiatt Grain & Feed, Inc. v. BerglandDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1978
- Suwannee Steamship Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1977
- Fordice v. ThomasMississippi Supreme Court · 1995
- Sierra Club v. HodelDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1987
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Wilmington Medical Center, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1977
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.