Richie v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Frank Holt, Justice.
The trial court, sitting as a jury, found appellant guilty of burglary and imposed a two-year sentence in the State Penitentiary. On appeal, the appellant contends for reversal that the evidence is insufficient to establish that a burglary had occurred, or that he had committed the alleged burglary.
In accordance with our well-established rule, we must view the evidence on appeal in the light most favorable to the appellee and sustain the verdict when there is any substantial evidence to support it. Crow v. State, 248 Ark, 1051, 455 S. W. 2d 89; Reynolds v. State, 211 Ark.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Scott v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935
- Reynolds v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947
- Crow v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
- Sanders v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1939
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
- Ward v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
- Ward v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975