Legal Opinion

Rauls v. DirecTV, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 10, 2011PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Frank A. Sedita, Jr., J.), entered November 9, 2009 in a personal injury action. The order and judgment awarded plaintiff money damages for defendant’s violation of Labor Law § 240 (1).

It is hereby ordered that the order and judgment so appealed from is unanimously reversed on the law without costs and the motion is denied.

Memorandum: Defendant contends on appeal that Supreme Court erred in sua sponte converting plaintiffs motion for leave to “renew” his prior motion for a default judgment to a motion for summary…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Parochial Bus Systems, Inc. v. Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Mihlovan v. GrozavuNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. Clark v. New York State Office of Parks, Recreation & Historic PreservationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  4. Wargo v. Amica Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  5. Rauls v. DirecTv, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. St. Anthony's High Sch. v. WainkikainenAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API