People v. Duff
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
The defendant’s challenge to the adequacy of his plea allocution is without merit. The defendant’s factual recitation and the plea colloquy were sufficient to make out all the elements of attempted robbery in the first degree. Even if the defendant’s allocution did not establish the essential elements of the crime to which he pleaded guilty, it would not require vacatur of his plea since there is no suggestion in the record that the plea was improvident or baseless (see, People v Nixon, 21 NY2d 338, 350, cert denied sub nom. Robinson v New York, 393 US 1067; People v Pelaccio, 141 AD2d 772;…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- People v. HarrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. SelikoffNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- People v. FrederickNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- People v. NixonNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
- People v. BethenyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- People v. GheradiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- People v. CantuAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- People v. O'KeefeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- People v. PantojasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- People v. RhodesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.