Peters v. Perry

OPINION

BARNES, Judge.

Case Summary

David Peters appeals the trial court’s entry of judgment against him based on his failure to comply with discovery. We dismiss.

Issue

Peters raises three issues. We address one dispositive issue, which is whether Peters’s notice of appeal was timely filed.

Facts

On May 5, 2004, Julie Perry, as a co-plaintiff, filed a complaint against Peters and others seeking to quiet title to certain property and to set aside fraudulent transfers. Extensive pleadings ensued, and on June 16, 2006, the trial court granted Perry’s motion for default judgment because of Peters’s…