Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Ford

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided May 14, 2010No. 2008-490Published

1Dissent

Reiber, C.J.,

¶22. dissenting. This case is about the proper scope of the emergency aid exception — an exception that recognizes those situations in which acting quickly to save lives takes priority over privacy interests. The majority holds today that when a police officer is informed of a serious car accident and sent to the accident victim’s last known address, the officer should sometimes risk leaving the victim dying in his home rather than investigating the situation further. The majority requires accident victims to leave visible signs, such as blood tracks or a wrecked vehicle, before…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Brigham City v. StuartSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  2. People v. MitchellNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Michigan v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  4. State v. FisherArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  5. United States v. Clarence Richardson, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API