Legal Opinion

Mays v. Siekman

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided November 17, 1976No. 40523PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtNewton, J.

This is a damage action by plaintiff, a horseback rider, to recover for personal injuries and the loss of the horse as the result of being struck by defendant Dana M. Siekman’s automobile. Plaintiff’s action against defendant Siekman and another defendant, Edward E. Hall, was dismissed. The court directed a verdict against plaintiff as to liability on defendant Siekman’s counterclaim for damage to his automobile and the jury assessed his damages at $1,154. We affirm the judgment of the District Court.

The accident occurred on the evening of October 16, 1972, on the north approach to a viaduct…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Guynan v. OlsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Bartosh v. SchlautmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Ecker v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANYNebraska Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Starlin v. Burlington Northern, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Matson v. DawsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1970

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Mays v. SiekmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API