Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Metropolitan Street Railway Co. v. Barker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 25, 1907PublishedCited by 2 opinions

- Appeal by the defendants, Edward P. Barker and others, as commissioners, etc., from a final order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 23d day of May, 1905, vacating an assessment ■ upon the capital stock of the relator for the yeat? 1897.

1Opinion of the Court

Ingraham, J.:

There are two questions presented upon this appeal, one relating to the amount of the total capital stock, óf the company fiable to taxation under section 12 of the Tax Law (Laws of 1896, chap. 908), and the second relating to certain- deductions allowed by the Special Term from the amount of- such capital stock which the defendants claim should not have been deducted under section 6 of the Tax Law. The referee’s report fixed the total value of the taxable assets of the relator on the second Monday of January, 1897,- at, $14,575,803.27. This consisted of tracks in the street;…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Delaware & Hudson Co v. FeitnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
  2. People Ex Rel. Delaware and Hudson Company v. . FeitnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1902

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Building Co. v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  2. People ex rel. Gorham Manufacturing Co. v. State Tax CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API