Legal Opinion

Mid-American Indemnity Insurance Co. v. King

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 7, 1995No. 94-0356PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpector, Justice

in which HIGHTOWER, CORNYN, GAMMAGE and ENOCH, Justices, joined.

The Texas Insurance Code generally requires an unauthorized insurer to post a bond before filing a pleading in defense of a lawsuit. Tex.Ins.Code art. 1.36, § 11(a). We consider in this original proceeding whether Mid-American Indemnity Insurance Co., an unauthorized insurer, is exempt from this general requirement under an exception added to the statute in 1993. The trial court held that Mid-American did not fall within the exception, and struck its pleadings after the company failed to post a bond. We agree with the trial…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Texas Ass'n of Business v. Texas Air Control BoardTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Johnson v. Fourth Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  4. TransAmerican Natural Gas Corp. v. PowellTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Blake v. McClungSupreme Court of the United States · 1898

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Lexington Insurance Co. v. StrayhornTexas Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Roy Seger v. Yorkshire Insurance Co., Ltd., and Ocean Marine Insurance Co., Ltd.Texas Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Strayhorn v. Lexington Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2004
  4. Yorkshire Ins. Co., Ltd. v. Seger, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2007
  5. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Lopez, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2001

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API