Legal Opinion
State v. Baker
New York Supreme Court
Decided December 1, 2014Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Joseph A. Santorelli, J.
In this Mental Hygiene Law article 10 proceeding, the respondent moves for an order pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (2) and (7) dismissing the petition. Petitioner opposes that application in all respects.
Respondent claims that the action must be dismissed because the petitioner: (1) lacks subject matter jurisdiction over the respondent; (2) failed to state a cause of action; and (3) violated the Due Process Clauses of the New York State and United States Constitutions. Specifically, respondent alleges that Mental Hygiene Law § 10.05 (e) does not allow…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Leon v. MartinezNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- Guggenheimer v. GinzburgNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Rovello v. Orofino Realty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Sokoloff v. Harriman Estates Development Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 2001
- State of New York v. RashidNew York Court of Appeals · 2010
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.