Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 12, 2006No. CR 05-1039PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Sandra Trotter Phillips, a full-time, state-salaried public defender for the Eleventh Judicial District, was appointed by the trial court to represent appellant, Rikko Smith, an indigent defendant. An appeal was filed, and a request for the transcribed record has been lodged in this court. This court denied the motion to be relieved that was submitted on December 8, 2005.

Ms. Phillips now moves again to withdraw as counsel on appeal based upon Rushing v. State, 340 Ark. 84, 8 S.W.3d 489 (2000), which held that full-time, state-salaried public defenders were ineligible for compensation for…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Rushing v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Tice v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API