Legal Opinion

Russaw v. Patel (CONSENT)

District Court, M.D. Alabama

Decided February 6, 2025No. 1:23-cv-00458Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION ANDRE RUSSAW, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) CASE NO. 1:23-CV-458-KFP ) AMITKUMAR PATEL, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Now pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Sanctions Pursuant to Rule 37 for failure to comply with the Court’s orders. Doc. 32. For the following reasons, the Court finds that the motion should be granted. I. BACKGROUND On August 2, 2023, Plaintiff Andre Russaw filed a Complaint against Defendants Amitkumar Patel and D & S, LLC (D&S) alleging in Count I that…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Roadway Express, Inc. v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Nishimatsu Construction Co., Ltd. v. Houston National Bank, Defendant-Third Party v. Jack D. Baize, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
  5. McLaughlin v. Richland Shoe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API