Legal Opinion

Rowley v. Marrcrest Homeowners' Ass'n

Utah Supreme Court

Decided October 25, 1982No. 17560PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEWART, Justice:

Plaintiffs, Howard and Nanette Rowley, brought this action for damages and an injunction to prevent Marrcrest Homeowners’ Association (hereinafter Marrcrest) from blocking Rowleys’ access to their driveway. The trial court found that Row-leys’ site plan for construction of their home and driveway had been approved upon the condition that they not use a specific Marrcrest common area for access to their driveway. The court ruled that the Rowleys had not complied with that condition, had an adequate remedy at law, and therefore were not entitled to an injunction. On appeal, the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Burke v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  2. McBride v. McBrideUtah Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Phoenix Ins. Co. v. HeathUtah Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Morgan v. Board of State LandsUtah Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Sandy Point Improvement Co. v. HuberCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Faulkner v. FarnsworthUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Angelos v. First Interstate Bank of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  3. View Condominium Owners Ass'n v. MSICO, L.L.C.Utah Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Koller v. Shaffer (In Re Evan O. Koller Revocable Living Trust)Court of Appeals of Utah · 2018
  5. Crosbie v. 750 West Owners Assoc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2026

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API