Legal Opinion

Copley v. Flint

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided October 15, 1843PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Ouachita, Curry, J.

1Opinion of the CourtBullard, J.

Judgment is asked, in solido, against the two defendants, on a contract entered into by Flint alone, assuming to act for himself, and as attorney in fact of Thomas. The instrument, which evidences this contract, recites, that Flint had given to Copley an order on Judge Peets, for a note made payable to E. H. Flint & Co. for about $945, bearing interest at ten per cent, which note, if collected by Copley, is to go in entire satisfaction of a debt of one thousand dollars, to bear interest from the dale of the agreement, which they jointly and severally promise to pay to said Copley, for a good…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. PowellSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1888
  2. Surplus Underwriters, Inc. v. SimmonsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API