Legal Opinion
JP Morgan Chase Bank v. Tate
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided March 24, 2009No. ED 91138PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., Presiding Judge.
Eric Tate and his wife, Cheryl Hall-Tate, (collectively referred to as “the Tates”) appeal from the judgment entered in favor of JP Morgan Chase Bank, as Trustee by Residential Funding Corporation, Attorney-in-Fact, (hereinafter “JP Morgan”) on its unlawful detainer action against the Tates. The Tates argue the trial court erred in failing to dismiss the unlawful detainer action pursuant to Section 534.300, RSMo 2000. 1 We affirm.
On June 28, 2000, the Tates executed a deed of trust, securing a loan in the principal amount of $67,000.00. On October 17,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
- Kohnen v. HameedMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
- Bach v. McGrathMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
- P.M. Construction Services, Inc. v. LewisMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
3Cited by8 opinions
- Federal National Mortgage Ass'n v. WilsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
- Boehm v. AllenMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
- Phelps v. PhelpsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
- Colt Investments, L.L.C. v. BoydMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
- US Bank, NA v. WatsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.