Legal Opinion

Whybrow v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided March 9, 1925No. Docket No. 609Published

An individual interior decorator having a library and some cash, held to be engaged in a "trade or business having no invested capital," and hence taxable in 1917 under section 209 of the revenue act of 1917.

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal of CLARENCE WHYBROW.

Whybrow v. Commissioner

Docket No. 609.

United States Board of Tax Appeals

1 B.T.A. 725; 1925 BTA LEXIS 2819;

March 9, 1925, decided Submitted February 28, 1925.

An individual interior decorator having a library and some cash, held to be engaged in a "trade or business having no invested capital," and hence taxable in 1917 under section 209 of the revenue act of 1917.

Ferdinand Tannenbaum, Esq., for the taxpayer.

Edward C. Lake, Esq. (Nelson T. Hartson, Solicitor of Internal Revenue) for the Commissioner.

STERNHAGEN

Before JAMES, STERNHAGEN, TRAMMELL, and TRUSSELL.

The…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Appeal of WhybrowUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API