Dottenheim v. Union Savings Bank & Trust Co.

1. Whether, in order to avail itself of privileges conferred by statute, a particular banking institution has shown itself to be a savings institution which pays interest on its deposits, and whose deposits are not subject to check, is, in this case, a question of fact for determination by the jury under the evidence.

2. A charge that “subject to check ” means subject to payment without limi*789tation or restriction, except that the check must he presented to the hank within banking hours, on banking days, is substantially correct.

4. The act of 1889, which confers upon all savings institutions all…