Legal Opinion
Burke v. Jenkins
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided March 28, 1934No. 24224PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.
The facts in this case are not greatly in dispute. They are as follows:
On November 29, 1930, the defendant in error, Thomas A.. Jenkins, took judgment on a cognovit note which plaintiff in error, P. J. Burke, had signed as maker. Upon motion of Burke, the judgment so taken was suspended, and Burke was permitted to file his answer. The answer contained two defenses. The first defense denied the execution and delivery of the note to Jenkins. The second defense alleged that on April 18, 1930, Burke went to the office of C. P. Ballard, vice president and cashier of the Ohio State Bank at…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Merchants' Bank v. State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Boston Steel & Iron Co. v. SteuerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
- Vander Ploeg v. Van ZuukSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
- Simpson v. First Nat. BankOregon Supreme Court · 1919
- Tower v. StanleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re William Norman Troy, Bankrupt. Mentor Lagoons Marina v. Myron Wasserman, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974
- United States v. Ben G. Milton, D/B/A Service Check CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1967
- Columbus Postal Employees Credit Union, Inc. v. MitchellOhio Court of Appeals · 1939