Legal Opinion

Metcalf v. R. D. Keene & Co.

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided December 17, 1935PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

R. D. Keene & Company entered into a written agreement with H. W. Metcalf for the purchase of all good and merchantable grapefruit, tangerines, oranges, and “Valencias” of the early bloom then growing on Metcalf’s grove; in return, Metcalf agreed to sell the same for eighty cents a box. All the fruit was to be taken from the grove by February 1st, 1932, except the “Temples” and “Valencias” which were to be taken by March 31st and May 10th of that year, respectively.

The buyer, R. D. Keene & Company, so it is alleged in various pleas, allowed a large part of the grapefruit and tangerines to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Producers Coke Co. v. HillmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
  2. Stokes v. BaarsSupreme Court of Florida · 1882
  3. Laswell v. National Handle Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1910
  4. Standard Growers Exchange v. HarrisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Indian Harbor Citrus, Inc. v. PoppellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  2. McDonald v. ConnellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
  3. Townsend Fruit Co. v. MayoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1957
  4. Gregg Maxcy, Inc. v. BatemanSupreme Court of Florida · 1937
  5. Vaughn-Griffin Packing Co. v. FisherSupreme Court of Florida · 1940

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API