Legal Opinion

State v. Montgomery

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided October 7, 2005No. 92,767PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Malone, J.:

The State appeals the trial court’s denial of its motion to correct Pernell Montgomery's sentence. The issue is whether the 2000 amendment to K.S.A. 21-4720(b)(5), see L. 2000, ch. 37, sec. 1; K.S.A. 2004 Supp. 21-4720(b)(5), which requires an appellate court to remand a case for resentencing when it reverses a defendant’s primary conviction, can be applied ret*512roactively to Montgomery’s case. We hold the amendment was intended to clarify rather than change existing law, and its retroactive application to Montgomery’s case does not prejudice his substantive rights.

On December 19,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. EnglesSupreme Court of Kansas · 2001
  2. State v. HeywoodSupreme Court of Kansas · 1989
  3. State v. BarnesSupreme Court of Kansas · 2004
  4. State v. HuffSupreme Court of Kansas · 2004
  5. Owen Lumber Co. v. ChartrandSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. DupreeSupreme Court of Kansas · 2016
  2. Rural Water District No. 4 v. City of Eudora, KansasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
  3. State v. BarkerCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2018
  4. State v. KleypasSupreme Court of Kansas · 2016
  5. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API