Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

People v. Benda

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided August 4, 1987No. Docket 92813Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partDanhof, C.J.

I fully agree with the majority’s conclusion that a one-year jail term cannot be lawfully imposed as a condition of life probation. However, I would simply vacate the illegal sentence and not remand the case to the trial court for reconsideration of defendant’s entire sentence.

While there are several cases in which this Court and the Supreme Court have ordered a remand after finding a condition of probation to be unlawful, I do not believe that such a result is the only appropriate remedy. In other cases, this Court has simply vacated the illegal condition. See, e.g., People v Higgins, 22…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. ColesMichigan Supreme Court · 1983
  2. People v. HigginsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  3. People v. GauntlettMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. People v. Carl SmithMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. People v. AlbaneMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API