Legal Opinion

United States v. McLaughlin

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided January 18, 1926No. 2601PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Smith, Judge,

delivered tbe opinion of tbe court:

Triangular bars of sweetened chocolate, manufactured by Sociéte Anonyme Chocolat Toiler of Berne, Switzerland, and containing 37.75 per centum of chocolate, 0.60 per centum of almonds, 60 to 61 per *405centum of sugar and 1 to 2 per centum of honey, were classified by the collector at the port of Boston as confectionery, and assessed for duty at 40 per centum ad valorem, under paragraph 505 of the Tariff Act of 1922, which paragraph, in so far as pertinent, reads as follows:

Par. 505. Sugar candy and all confectionery not specially provided for, 40…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Arthur v. StephaniSupreme Court of the United States · 1878

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. John S. Connor, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
  2. Canada Dry Ginger Ale, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959
  3. Tower v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1955
  4. United States v. ThomasCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
  5. C. J. Van Houten & Zoon, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API