Legal Opinion
Tooley v. Martin-Marietta Corp.
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided September 27, 1979No. Civ. 76-933PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SOLOMON, District Judge:
Herman Tooley, Arnold Bakke and Edward Helt filed this Title VII action for relief from religious discrimination by their employer, the Martin-Marietta Corporation (company); their local union, United Steelworkers of America, Local 8141 (union); and their national union, United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO (national union).
In October 1976 the company and the union entered into a collective bargaining agreement which includes a closed shop provision. Plaintiffs were then subject to discharge if they failed to join the union. All three plaintiffs are Seventh…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Wisconsin v. YoderSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Sherbert v. VernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Walz v. Tax Comm'n of City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Zorach v. ClausonSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Nottelson v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- Herman O. Tooley, Edward J. Helt and Arnold G. Bakke v. Martin-Marietta Corporation, a Corporation and United Steel Workers of America, Local 8141Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Nottelson v. Smith Steel Workers D.A.L.U. 19806Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
- American Motors Corp. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1979
- Anderson v. General Dynamics Convair Aerospace DivisionDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1980
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.