Goldsmith v. Sachs
United States Circuit Court
Demurrer to Complaint. The facts sufficiently appear in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSawyer, J.
This is an action on a contract to enter into a partnership, which the defendants are alleged to have refused to carry *727out. They comena that the partnership never went into effect, and, consequently, that there are no partnership affairs to settle up. It is also correctly contended that only an action at law will lie for the breach. But this is an action at law by one of the parties against several of the others, who are alleged to have refused to go on with the partnership. The parties to the contract are Isam White, E. L. Heller, S. W. Heller, Martin Sachs, Sanford Sachs, Max Goldsmith, and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bagley v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1853
- Townsend and Others v. GoeweyNew York Supreme Court · 1838
- Hill v. PalmerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1882
- Wadsworth v. ManningCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1853
- Collamer v. FosterSupreme Court of Vermont · 1854
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Wilson v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Shannon Copper Co. v. PotterArizona Supreme Court · 1910
- Fincher v. Belk-Sawyer CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961
- Wright v. AmannU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada · 1910