Legal Opinion
Morrow v. Ætna Casualty & Surety Co.
Syracuse City Court
Decided May 17, 1966PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtTony Mancuso, J.
This is a motion for summary judgment by defendant.
*190The complaint alleges a cause of action on an automobile insurance policy. At the argument of the motion, the parties stipulated a specimen of the policy which provided: “ Part III— Physical Damage, Coverage D (1) — Comprehensive (excluding Collision).” There was no collision coverage on the vehicle. Plaintiff claims coverage for damage to his vehicle under the comprehensive clause when his automobile collided with a deer on April 22, 1960 on the Massachusetts Turnpike near Springfield, Massachusetts. Defendant urges an exclusion alleging…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Tonkin v. California Insurance Co. of San Francisco, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1945
- Newtown Creek Towing Co. v. . Aetna Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1900
- Mohawk Valley Fuel Co. v. Home Indemnity Co.New York Supreme Court · 1957
- Shahin v. Niagara Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1943
- Getzoff v. Piedmont Fire InsuranceAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1953