Legal Opinion

Campbell v. American Fidelity & Casualty Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 22, 1937PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBaeNhill, J.

The hotel of the plaintiff at Hertford, N. 0., was used by the Bus Line as a passenger station, or a bus stop. She rendered service to the Bus Company by answering the telephone, giving information about the arrival and departure of buses and about the schedule, fares, and baggage. In return she received a pass entitling her to. ride free of charge on the buses of the Bus Line. When injured she was riding on the bus by virtue of the pass, going from Hertford to Norfolk.

It may then be conceded that the plaintiff was an employee of the Bus Line at the time of her injuries. Her duties as such…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Powell v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1914
  2. Norfolk Southern Railroad v. ChatmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  3. Cates v. . HallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Thompson v. LassiterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  2. Bradford v. KellySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  3. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. v. BraxtonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1948
  4. Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co. v. HammerDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1949
  5. Atlantic Greyhound Lines v. SkinnerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API