Farnham v. Pepper
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Julius J. Olson, Justice.
Plaintiff appeals from an order denying her motion for new trial after an adverse verdict. She brought this action to recover damages for injuries received by her in an automobile accident;. In her complaint she charged the defendant with operating his automobile “at a high and dangerous rate of speed, without having same under proper control, without maintaining a proper lookout and without giving any timely warning .or signal,” as á consequence whereof defendant “caused his automobile to collide with great force and violence upon and against an automobile driven by…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Sommerfield v. FluryWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929
- Krause v. HallWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
- Hutchinson v. Sioux City Service Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1930
- Goehmann v. National Biscuit Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
- Haines v. DuffyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Merritt v. StuveSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
- Smith v. Otto Hendrickson Post 212, American LegionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Kapla v. LehtiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
- Heise v. the JR Clark Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Dehen v. BerningSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.