State v. Portillo
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtShort, J.
Cesar Portillo appeals his conviction and twenty-five year sentence for first-degree criminal sexual conduct with a minor (CSC), arguing the trial court erred in: (1) qualifying a witness as an expert in child sexual assault cases and child sexual assault forensic interviewing; (2) allowing the expert to exceed his scope of expertise and testify about the significance of language and hand gestures used by the victim (Victim); and (3) allowing the expert to testify Victim exhibited symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) where no diagnosis of PTSD was made. We affirm.
*68FACTS
In 2010,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Yates v. EvattSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- State v. WilsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
- State v. PaganSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
- State v. DunbarSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
- State v. SchumpertSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2015