Legal Opinion

Henderson v. Matthews

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 14, 1976No. 66PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EXUM, Justice.

We allowed Henderson’s petition for further review to consider whether the Court of Appeals erred in ordering new trials of the passengers’ claims against defendant Henderson upon an appeal taken only by defendant Matthews. In our opinion it did.

Appellate courts do not generally vindicate the rights of parties aggrieved at trial who could appeal but choose not to do so. Quenby Corp. v. Connor Co., 272 N.C. 208, 158 S.E. 2d 18 (1967); cf. Van Dyke v. Insurance Co., 173 N.C. 700, 91 S.E. 600 (1917); but see Edwards v. Butler, 244 N.C. 205, 92 S.E. 2d 922 (1956) (exercise of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Pinnix v. . GriffinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  2. Mayo v. American Fire & Casualty CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  3. Gower v. Aetna Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  4. Edwards v. ButlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  5. Conger v. Travelers Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Harris v. HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. In re ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  3. In Re the Estate of JohnsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  4. In re Harris Teeter, LLCSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2021
  5. In re Harris Teeter, LLCSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2021

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API