Legal Opinion

Shaw & Morehouse v. Moser

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1853PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court,

Johnson, J.

This was an action of assumpsit originally tried before a Justice of the Peace. The plaintiffs in error, who were the defendants below, did not appear before the Justice, and judgment was rendered against them.

'Shaw, one of the defendants below, appealed to the County Court, and one of the special causés of appeal set out in his affidavit, was that the J ustice below acquired no jurisdiction over the defendánfs by reason of the insufficiency of the re^ turn of the constable upon the original summons, which said return was in the following language, viz: “Personally…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bates v. ConklíngNew York Supreme Court · 1833
  2. Legg v. StillmanNew York Supreme Court · 1823
  3. People v. Judges of Yates Common PleasNew York Supreme Court · 1828

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Miner v. FrancisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Craighead v. MartinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1878
  3. McCombs v. JohnsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. TessIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API