Legal Opinion

Meuer v. Schellenger

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided June 26, 1939No. 4114PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJackson, Judge

This is an appeal in an interference proceeding involving two counts. The interference is between an application of the party Meuer and Stevens, filed May 16, 1931, and the application of the party Schellenger, filed March 30, 1932. Meuer and Stevens are therefore the senior party, and the burden was upon Schellenger to establish priority of invention by a preponderance of the evidence.

The interference involved four counts before the tribunals below, both of which tribunals awarded priority of invention to Meuer and Stevens as to counts 1 and 4, and to Schellenger as to counts 2 and 3. While…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Dickinson v. ZurkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. Dickinson v. ZurkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Alumatone Corp. v. Vita-Var Corp.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1950
  4. Etten v. Lovell Mfg. Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1949
  5. Alumatone Corporation v. Vitavar CorporationCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1950

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API